3. What have you learned from your audience
feedback?
During
our initial planning stages we underwent much audience research from
questionnaires to a Q and A session. The first stage was to establish a target
audience based on the genre and style of the music. Pop and rock attract a
mainly younger audience and a female singer draws an audience of both male and female
(as opposed to a male singer which would draw a primarily female audience). We
reasoned from this that our audience had to be a mixture of male and female and
within an age range of mid teens to young adults. We began with a series of
ideas laid out in a presentation which we tested on our media group, the
perfect mixture of male and female between the ages of seventeen to nineteen.
We then asked them for feedback on our initial ideas and handed out
questionnaires to a select focus group who we believe represented what we
wanted in our audience.
The
strengths of this method of research are mainly its ability to produce thorough
results on a select audience that best represents our target market(as opposed
to a more broad form of testing such as handing out questionnaires at random to
people on the street). The major fault of this method is that the range of our
audience created a mixture of results which made it difficult to create
accurate changes to our first ideas. Using comments on our initial ideas and
our questionnaire results we made small changes to our product before and after
filming.
Research
is important because of the changes it causes to the process of making the
video. Without a focus group to test our initial ideas we could have run ahead
with a bad idea or missed out on including something important that would have
drawn people in. the initial feedback regarding our production ideas was very
positive and the bulk of our audience feedback and suggestions were relating to
our style and whether we should produce a video of a narrative or performance
based structure.
Our
initial research showed us many things such as how we should edit the final
piece and what we should focus on in regards to props and location. Although
there were a lot of compromises made in regards to locations and mise en scene
due to our lack of performance space and having to rely on an actress. We think
of our audience research as important mainly because it shows us what our
target market want and that we should meet their needs to ensure capital and
popularity among a large base of fans.
To gauge reaction to our video we performed an audience survey
with members of our target audience and solicited the opinions of two other
media students.
We asked that each audience member who filled in our previous
questionnaire (relating to our music choice) fill out this new one (relating to
our video)
1-Kingston Capes-male-student-age 18
2-Evan Davies-male-student-age-19
3-Timor Kaya-male student-age18
4-Emily Reeves-female-student age 17
5-Rachael Evans-female-student-age 17
6-Shannon Tate-female-student-age 18
What did you like most about the
video?
|
The singer
|
The singer
|
The locations
|
The style
|
The locations
|
The editing
|
From this question we hoped to learn what the
greatest asset in the video is with specifics regarding whether it was our
singer or something we did during production such as special effects or
selection of locations. The most interesting response is the selection of
editing and style as the best part of the video. This would imply that the main
focal point for these viewers was not the singer but how she was portrayed and
what effects were used to make the video.
Knowing all this we can assume that
because only two people stated the singer to be their favourite thing about the
video that although she was intended to be the main focal point that she didn’t
come across as such. If we were to make changes to our video based on this we
would have to revolve them around bring out the singer and using flashier
effects to hopefully improve audience reaction to the editing.
What could have been improved?
|
The editing
|
Costume
|
The lip synching
|
The locations
|
Costume
|
The lighting in certain scenes
|
From this we hoped to learn exactly what we could
have done better and what we may still be able to improve before the final
release which is of course the purpose of this method of focus group testing. I
find it interesting that someone brought up the lighting and that someone also
brought up the editing. The editing was what in the end had the most time spent
on it given the use of effects and fast paced shots. I think the main reason
this was brought up was the use of shots that extended beyond others in terms
of length. This was done intentionally to allow the audience to adjust to a
situation before ripping them out of it for shock. I also can see why the
lighting may have been brought up as there are some scenes where we had to edit
saturation and hue of colours in order to create a sense of darkness due to
actual darkness being impractical on some days of shooting. I was not expecting anyone to comment on
costume given that it was one of our focal points during early production that
the costume reflect the character and the perceived stereotype of the party
girl. I chased this comment up hoping to discover more about it and found that
the party found the costume unusual for a pop video as it defied conventions
somewhat in that it was not very scandalous. It has become a theme in pop music
for the artists in videos to be fairly overtly sexualised obviously we found
this a problem whilst working with a student as our actress for the video. The
second person to comment on costume noted that the “erratic” way in which it
changed was strange. This was done to represent changes in the song so we
decided to take this as someone not quite understanding what we were trying to
do. All in all I expect for this
knowledge to greatly influence our design we now know we have several points to
alter that we wouldn’t have known about beforehand. This will really help us
make any necessary changes to the lighting and editing.
Does the music match the video’s
genre?
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
yes
|
From this question we hoped to learn how well the
images and video mixed with the song and its genre style. It is one of the most
important factors in the music video industry that what is produced is relevant
to the genre, styles and context of the artist it’s representing. We were very
happy to see how we were able to match the music with the video.
What did you think of locations?
|
Good
|
Appropriate
|
Good
|
Could have been better
|
Excellent
|
Fitting
|
From this we hoped to learn if our locations were
well suited to the song and video and if so how much. I find it interesting that we received
results calling the locations fitting and appropriate, I take an interest here
because I wanted to know if these locations were as such because of the reasons
we originally chose them or because of something else. Our original plan was to
use the locations of the underpass and the streets to create a image for our
artist revolving around her being a young urban party girl. We chased up these
comments and we were told that the locations of the streets fitted the song
itself rather than the theming and were also told that the changing of location
to location via cues in the song was well implemented. The singular comment of
“could have been better.” Surprised us somewhat of course we were expecting
somewhat for at least one of the people we canvassed to react in a negative way
and we of course were not surprised that they were the same person we saw
suggesting an improvement in the locations earlier in the questionnaire. From
these comments and singular and somewhat negative reaction we summarised that
we had done all we could to the video concerning location.
Costume?
|
Good
|
Could have been improved
|
Good
|
Strange at times
|
Too erratic it was strange that it
kept changing
|
I liked them
|
The costume question was intended to get a precise definition
of what we did and did not do right. We had already chased up earlier negative
comments on costume so we were not really expecting a comment saying that it
may have been “strange at times.” We can see how this could come across in
perhaps the moments we filmed where we had our actress wearing a police cap. Of
course this disconcerting news about the costume has caused us to rethink some
of our ideals concerning it and although we were placed under limitations such
as money and having to use clothing our actress already owned we believe that
we came out well.
Actress?
|
Good
|
Very good
|
good
|
Very likeable
|
Attractive
|
Good and used to full effect
|
From this we hoped to learn of exactly how our
actress came across to our audience. We wanted to know whether we had made the
correct choice concerning the aesthetical implications of our actress and how
well people believed she performed. We were pleased to find results that called
her both “attractive” and “very likeable” and also were pleased to know we
“used her to full effect”. Our intention was to use our actress in a way that
made her identifiable from scene to scene as well as creating the image we
hoped for. Our results show us the correct choice we made and reflect very well
on her skills concerning things like lip synching and maintaining herself in
front of a camera.
What would you like to see more of
in the video?
|
A more straightforward narrative
|
More performance(who played the
music)
|
Narrative
|
Special effects
|
A greater range of shot types
|
narrative
|
This question is a slight revision of the earlier
question “what could we improve” however it is reworded so we know exactly what
we did right and how we could expand on it. The first thing I noticed whilst
reviewing the answers was the call for “a more straightforward narrative” this
is something we planned for but were unable to carry out due to restraints of
time and the availability of certain locations. It was also interesting to see
the call for special effects given that the video and song do not lend
themselves easily to them. I was also not expecting to see the call for more
performance pieces. The actual artist of the song (Kristen Faulconer) does not
actually have a regular backup band and usually relies on synthetic computer
generated sound for her songs instrumentals. Knowing this we know we should
have put together a narrative that did not require overly complex set and prop
use and that we may have been better received had we focused on our artists
supports and skills rather than just her as a scripted individual.
How well produced do you think it
is?
1 to 10
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
7
|
6
|
8
|
From this final question we wanted to learn overall
how well put together and planned. People obviously felt that whilst below any
professional level our video was enough to merit a higher mark than a five
which we were initially quite worried was going to be the reaction. From this
summary we can learn that people both enjoyed the video and that it was well
received for both the video itself and the choices we made to make it. we
expected a small gap between our highest result and our lowest result and we
think the two point gap between six and eight.
Our final audience feedback is quite positive and shows us that the original
ideas we expanded on with help from our test groups have been improved greatly.
Our feedback has shown us the changes we made were essential to the video and
our construction of it.